System to rank scientists was pedalled by Jeffreys
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Using the h-index to rank influential information scientists
We apply a new bibliometric measure, the h-index (Hirsch, 2005), to the literature of information science. Faculty rankings based on raw citation counts are compared with those based on h-counts. There is a strong positive correlation between the two sets of rankings. We show how the h-index can be used to express the broad impact of a scholar’s research output over time in more nuanced fashion...
متن کاملBy the scientists, for the scientists
My association with the JCB began very early in my scientific career. In fact, it predated my understanding that there would even be a scientific career. In the mid-1970s while still an undergraduate, the JCB published my very first paper, a contribution noted perhaps less so for its reporting the characterization of the first known protein in plant cell walls than for a footnote that called at...
متن کاملStatistical regularities in the rank-citation profile of scientists
Recent science of science research shows that scientific impact measures for journals and individual articles have quantifiable regularities across both time and discipline. However, little is known about the scientific impact distribution at the scale of an individual scientist. We analyze the aggregate production and impact using the rank-citation profile c(i)(r) of 200 distinguished professo...
متن کاملA Note on Bound for Jensen-Shannon Divergence by Jeffreys
We present a lower bound on the Jensen-Shannon divergence by the Jeffrers’ divergence when pi ≥ qi is satisfied. In the original Lin's paper [IEEE Trans. Info. Theory, 37, 145 (1991)], where the divergence was introduced, the upper bound in terms of the Jeffreys was the quarter of it. In view of a recent shaper one reported by Crooks, we present a discussion on upper bounds by transcendental fu...
متن کاملResistance by scientists to scientific discovery.
In the study of the history and sociology of science, there has been a relative lack of attention to one of the interesting aspects of the social process of discovery-the resistance on the part of scientists themselves to scientific discovery. General and specialized histories of science and biographies and autobiographies of scientists, as well as intensive discussions of the processes by whic...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Nature
سال: 2005
ISSN: 0028-0836,1476-4687
DOI: 10.1038/437951e